Differenze tra le versioni di "Wiki Loves Monuments/2013/Grant report/Satisfaction survey"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (fix) |
m (fix) |
||
| Riga 8: | Riga 8: | ||
* I'm a | * I'm a | ||
** a) chapter volunteer | ** a) chapter volunteer | ||
| − | ** b) | + | ** a) thematic organization volunteer |
| + | ** b) chapter staff | ||
| + | ** a) WMF staff | ||
| + | ** b) chapter staff | ||
** c) other | ** c) other | ||
Versione delle 11:12, 11 feb 2013
- This is the 1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th time I'm attending the Wikimedia Conference
- a) 1st
- b) 2nd
- c) 3rd
- d) 4th
- e) 5th
- I'm a
- a) chapter volunteer
- a) thematic organization volunteer
- b) chapter staff
- a) WMF staff
- b) chapter staff
- c) other
- Overall rating for Wikimedia Conference 2013
- a) Very dissatisfied
- b) Dissatisfied
- c) Satisfied
- d) Very satisfied
- Overall rating for the conference programme (did it meet the expectations of you chapter and you personally)
- a) Very dissatisfied
- b) Dissatisfied
- c) Satisfied
- d) Very satisfied
- Did you feel the lenght of the conference sessions were too long, just about right or too short?
- a) too long
- b) just about right
- c) too short
- Overall, how satisfied were you with the content of the conference sessions?
- a) Very dissatisfied
- b) Dissatisfied
- c) Very satisfied
- d) Satisfied
- The conference was well organized
- a) Strongly disagree
- b) Disagree
- c) Agree
- d) Strongly agree
- What kind of sessions would you like to see included at future conferences?
- What did you like most about the conference?
- What did you like least about the conference?
- In which ways could this conference be improved?
- Do you have any suggestion for coping with the increasing dimension of the conference?