Differenze tra le versioni di "Wiki Loves Monuments/2013/Grant report/Satisfaction survey"

Da Wikimedia Italia.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
m (+ una domanda. e ho messo c) other)
Riga 9: Riga 9:
 
** a) chapter volunteer
 
** a) chapter volunteer
 
** b) paid staff
 
** b) paid staff
 +
** c) other
  
 
* Overall rating for Wikimedia Conference 2013
 
* Overall rating for Wikimedia Conference 2013
Riga 46: Riga 47:
  
 
*In which ways could this conference be improved?
 
*In which ways could this conference be improved?
 +
 +
* Do you any suggestion for coping with the increasing dimension of the conference?

Versione delle 10:26, 11 feb 2013

  • This is the 1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th time I'm attending the Wikimedia Conference
    • a) 1st
    • b) 2nd
    • c) 3rd
    • d) 4th
    • e) 5th
  • I'm a
    • a) chapter volunteer
    • b) paid staff
    • c) other
  • Overall rating for Wikimedia Conference 2013
    • a) Very dissatisfied
    • b) Dissatisfied
    • c) Satisfied
    • d) Very satisfied
  • Overall rating for the conference programme (did it meet the expectations of you chapter and you personally)
    • a) Very dissatisfied
    • b) Dissatisfied
    • c) Satisfied
    • d) Very satisfied
  • Did you feel the lenght of the conference sessions were too long, just about right or too short?
    • a) too long
    • b) just about right
    • c) too short
  • Overall, how satisfied were you with the content of the conference sessions?
    • a) Very dissatisfied
    • b) Dissatisfied
    • c) Very satisfied
    • d) Satisfied
  • The conference was well organized
    • a) Strongly disagree
    • b) Disagree
    • c) Agree
    • d) Strongly agree
  • What kind of sessions would you like to see included at future conferences?
  • What did you like most about the conference?
  • What did you like least about the conference?
  • In which ways could this conference be improved?
  • Do you any suggestion for coping with the increasing dimension of the conference?