Differenze tra le versioni di "Empowering Italian GLAMs/Tech evaluations"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Specifications: +info) |
m (fix) |
||
Riga 12: | Riga 12: | ||
; User storage needed: 30G (1000 musei, 20 foto, 1.5M/foto) | ; User storage needed: 30G (1000 musei, 20 foto, 1.5M/foto) | ||
; Dependencies | ; Dependencies | ||
− | + | * PHP (executes Python commands) | |
− | + | * MySQL database | |
− | + | * Python | |
;Available servers: | ;Available servers: |
Versione delle 21:38, 8 set 2022
Information about the tool related to Empowering Italian GLAMs.
Specifications
- Domain
- To be discussed:
https://musei-su-wikipedia.wmcloud.org/
(if on WMF Wikimedia Cloud servers)- ...
- Command line access
- Should be not required.
- User storage needed
- 30G (1000 musei, 20 foto, 1.5M/foto)
- Dependencies
- PHP (executes Python commands)
- MySQL database
- Python
- Available servers
- Cloud VPS: to be requested
- server from current provider
💼 vh
- average cost max. 400€ / server, automated backups already included lessema: enough storage but it's dedicated to CiviCRM - not enough separationbeta: not owned by WMITdelta: not owned by WMITepsilon: not owned by WMIThorror: dedicated to backups - not enough separationintreccio: not enough storagemanoscritto: not enough storage - not enough separation with ZNUNYtoolforge: not enough storage- https://t.me/wmcloudirc/44175
Questions from Cloud VPS activists
- About unclear copyright status files on Wikimedia Cloud servers
<bozzy> there is a person who verifies a scanned piece of paper in which a museum manager authorizes the release in free license, before uploading on Commons. <bozzy> This way the Commons community does not receive an avalanche of problematic data. We felt it was more respectful to them. [29/08/22 17:10] <taavi> you can't store material with unclear copyright status on WMCS either..
- About uploading directly on Commons
<bozzy> The tool will be a sort of "image uploader". Kind of "pre-Commons" for a GLAM-related project in a specific country. [29/08/22 17:00] <bd808_> Why not upload to commons and then mark the "unuseful" things for deletion? Commons will have more storage and better performance than almost any Cloud VPS project. <bd808> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team is exactly for things like reviewing and validating image releases as well. I'm not saying I know enough to say that there is no need for a staging process, but this all sounds like things that the community knows how to deal with.
Team
- Developer
- Voluntary consultation