Differenze tra le versioni di "Empowering Italian GLAMs/Tech evaluations"

Da Wikimedia Italia.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Riga 3: Riga 3:
 
== Specifications ==
 
== Specifications ==
  
−
;Domain: To be identified.
+
;Domain: To be discussed:
 +
 
 +
* https://musei-su-wikipedia.wmcloud.org/
 +
* ...
  
 
; Command line access: Should be not required.
 
; Command line access: Should be not required.

Versione delle 10:04, 30 ago 2022

Information about the tool related to Empowering Italian GLAMs.

Specifications

Domain
To be discussed:
Command line access
Should be not required.
User storage needed
30G (1000 musei, 20 foto, 1.5M/foto)
Dependencies
* PHP (executes Python commands)
* MySQL database
* Python
Available servers
  • Cloud VPS: to be requested
    m:wikitech:Wikitech:Cloud Services Terms of use
  • server from current provider 💼 vh - average cost max. 400€ / server, automated backups already included
  • lessema: enough storage but it's dedicated to CiviCRM - not enough separation
  • beta: not owned by WMIT
  • delta: not owned by WMIT
  • epsilon: not owned by WMIT
  • horror: dedicated to backups - not enough separation
  • intreccio: not enough storage
  • manoscritto: not enough storage - not enough separation with ZNUNY
  • toolforge: not enough storage - https://t.me/wmcloudirc/44175

Questions from Cloud VPS activists

About unclear copyright status files on Wikimedia Cloud servers
<bozzy> there is a person who verifies a scanned piece of paper in which a museum manager authorizes the release in free license, before uploading on Commons.
<bozzy> This way the Commons community does not receive an avalanche of problematic data. We felt it was more respectful to them.
[29/08/22 17:10]
<taavi> you can't store material with unclear copyright status on WMCS either..
About uploading directly on Commons
<bozzy> The tool will be a sort of "image uploader". Kind of "pre-Commons" for a GLAM-related project in a specific country.
[29/08/22 17:00]
<bd808_> Why not upload to commons and then mark the "unuseful" things for deletion? Commons will have more storage and better performance than almost any Cloud VPS project.
<bd808> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team is exactly for things like reviewing and validating image releases as well. I'm not saying I know enough to say that there is no need for a staging process, but this all sounds like things that the community knows how to deal with.

Team

Developer
Voluntary consultation
Estratto da "https://wiki.wikimedia.it/index.php?title=Empowering_Italian_GLAMs/Tech_evaluations&oldid=1265139"