Differenze tra le versioni di "Libre and Open Source"
(pagina a caso) |
(+ m:FLOSS-Exchange) |
||
| Riga 50: | Riga 50: | ||
Jitsi Meeting is nice because it's very easy and it natively allows ''streaming'' to any social network (whatever RMTP URL), and it has advanced audio volume management, for each participant. | Jitsi Meeting is nice because it's very easy and it natively allows ''streaming'' to any social network (whatever RMTP URL), and it has advanced audio volume management, for each participant. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == File archiviation: Nextcloud == | ||
| + | |||
| + | We are happy with NextCloud. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == See also == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[m:FLOSS-Exchange]] | ||
[[Categoria:Strumenti]] | [[Categoria:Strumenti]] | ||
Versione delle 14:27, 19 set 2022
Wikimedia Italy believes in Free/Libre and Open Source software as the only good way to freely share in the sum of all knowledge.
This page describes some Free/Libre software in use in the WMIT association, and why.
Survey: LimeSurvey
.svg){kind=logo}
In 2021, Italian Linux Society (partner of Wikimedia Italy) invested in security auditing on LimeSurvey, with the goal of assuring that there was no excuse for adopting LimeSurvey in Wikimedia Italia or Wikimedia Foundation.
LimeSurvey is now in use in Wikimedia Italia (hosted by our infrastructure), and since 2022 LimeSurvey is also in use in Wikimedia Foundation (hosted by LimeSurvey).
- LimeSurvey advantages
- powerful platform really multi-language
- powerful flexible user roles
- 100% data ownership
- GDPR friendly
- no limitations / easy to hack and extend
- LimeSurvey disadvantages
- not suitable for fast prototyping or hot changes
- About LimeSurvey in Wikimedia projects
- About LimeSurvey in Wikimedia Italy
Project management: Wikimedia Phabricator
.svg)
Wikimedia Phabricator is a very good piece of software that increase team throughput, focusing about things, identify deadlocks, and with good backlog management.
- Wikimedia Phabricator advantages
- accurate sub-task management and visualization (to better triage blocking parts)
- powerful access level system (ability to create private "Spaces", to have private and public Tasks organized together)
- trasparency (no need to login to see something)
- not project-centric (a single Task can involve multiple projects or departments)
- transparency (no need to login to see something)
- Wikimedia Phabricator disadvantages
- not so popular or mainstream
- About Wikimedia Phabricator
Videocall: BigBlueButton and Jitsi Meeting
We use BigBlueButton for serious meetings (e.g. assembly) and for staff meetings, since it has very powerful moderation tools, plus a collaborative whiteboard.
The problem with BigBlueButton is that our local service provider is very strict in our integration with Moodle. For example, in our BBB, guests cannot change their names. So, we usually invite special guests in Moodle, so they have a name. That's why sometime Jitsi Meeting is preferred.
Jitsi Meeting is nice because it's very easy and it natively allows streaming to any social network (whatever RMTP URL), and it has advanced audio volume management, for each participant.
File archiviation: Nextcloud
We are happy with NextCloud.